Business Background and Introduction of the Concept
Our On-premise customers today face an uphill task of mapping requirements with processes across several solution offerings. Even in a specific area like project management, we see a lot of different capabilities provided in different project management solutions. Some solutions offer a great risk management framework; some offer a wonderful scheduling experience while some others offer seamless integration to downstream and third-party applications. But all these solutions try to address the same base purpose, “The need to have an integrated end-to-end business process setup for project ”, starting from ideation to project closure.
Having implemented different Project management solutions from SAP at various customers, this idea of creating an integrated end-to-end process is easier said than done. On paper these solutions seem like the best fit for each scenario, and in specific cases they are, but on the field, the story gets a bit more interesting.
Let us take the example of a simple Portfolio and Project Management scenario built using SAP PPM 1.0 for S/4HANA. Now this is by far the most robust and capable solution offering in the project management space today. It has a full-fledged Portfolio Management framework that caters to key functionalities like portfolio planning, bucket hierarchies, scenario modeling, questionnaires and many more. It has a complete project management capability set, that out classes even the best of breed solutions in the market today. Additionally, with direct integration to Project Systems and other ECC components, it makes a case for a fully integrated end-to-end offering.
This is certainly true in most project scenarios, but where this solution starts struggling is in the multi-level project arena where projects are managed by multiple affiliates and setup in a headquarters-subsidiary or central services model. These projects typically run into multiple levels and have very large work breakdown structures. Also, there could be multiple stakeholders responsible for different sections of the project, which makes coordination, data consolidation and progress reporting a complicated and tedious task.
A simple sketch of various capabilities required for an on-premise multi-level project setup is shown below:
- Projects become cumbersome and hard to manage, resulting in delays in identifying, tracking, and solving issues
- Access management of specific project sections to subsidiary teams is complicated to implement
- Lack of control over subsidiary scope and budget tracking leads to overruns or delays
- Multiple channels of inputs for the program managers to consolidate and report
- Unnecessary functionality provided to Subsidiary projects as they do not require full-fledged project management capabilities all the time.
- Massive change management efforts during onboarding new suppliers and upgrades.
- In-accurate reporting due to delays in some subsidiaries impacts all reports
The Great Collaboration
- Headquarters has real-time visibility on all project activities associated with the master project
- Single platform to track and manage projects for customers dealing with multiple subsidiaries
- Subsidiary projects operated in silos on the cloud enabling restricted access only to specific project areas
- Integrations with cloud-based procurement, billing for all subsidiary projects
- Light weight project management on subsidiary side to increase time to adoption and reduce change management efforts
- Development
- R&D Engineering
- Strategic Feasibility
- Consulting / IT
- Engineering and Construction
- Professional services
- Commercial Property and Lease Contract Management
The Potential Outcome
- Portfolio Management
- Scoring Models and What-if scenario Analysis
- Proposal Management
- Project Structuring and Scheduling
- Progress Tracking
- Time Entry
- Billing and Invoicing
- Project Based Procurement
- Actual Cost Reporting
Tier1
- Portfolio Manager prepares portfolio forecast and allocates budget per bucket
- Program manager and steering committee members evaluate and finalize potential projects
- Project manager prepares project plan and identifies subsidiary projects
- Periodically, project progress can be pulled from the subsidiary project via the Read API and rolled back up into the master project.
Tier2
- Subsidiary project managers prepare detailed project plan for their specific subsidiary project
- Project managers allocate budget to lower level work packages / WBS elements
No comments:
Post a Comment